Custom Search

Prevent hate crimes by using firearms.  Liberals want to deter hate crimes by enacting hate crime legislation.  Conservatives respond that if Vincent Chin had had a gun, he would be alive today.  A pragmatist wants both hate crime laws and guns.  Liberals call the Los Angeles riots a "civil disturbance".  Conservatives say that the Korean-American victims of the riots needed more shotguns.  (The Untouchables: "He pulls a knife on you, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. That's the Chicago way.") 

Support tax reform.  Hong Kong has a flat income tax and its per capita income is higher than that of Great Britain.  With Anglo-Saxon law, education and capitalism, Hong Kong has more Chinese millionaires per capita than any other country. 

Support school vouchers.
    Bigots for the Left discriminate against Asian American students.  See Lafayette High School and South Philadelphia High School.  If they had school vouchers, Asian American students could escape from the Bigots for the Left.
    Support www.studentsfirst.org founded by Michelle Rhee.
    Support Asian American charter schools.
    The public schools increase taxes and shovel more money into a rat hole to pay for bloated overhead and teachers' unions while test scores decline. 
    Only fools or the poor attend public schools in New York City or Washington, D.C.  The Dallas school district commits criminal malfeasance, wasting hundreds of thousands of dollars every year.
    School choice already exists: parents who can afford it send their kids to private schools or move to better school districts.  If school vouchers were available, Asian- American students could transfer to better schools.  However, teachers' unions are holding poor students hostage.  See "Waiting for Superman".  
    Because desegregation plans committed reverse discrimination against Asian- Americans students, their parents filed successful lawsuits in San Francisco and Houston.  If school vouchers were available, Asian- American students could transfer to better schools.
    Gore was the only presidential candidate in 2000 who opposed school vouchers.  He grew up in D.C.  Neither he nor his children attended D.C.'s public schools.  Neither the Clintons nor the Obamas sent their children to D.C.'s public schools.

Stop contributing to the Democratic and Republican National Committees. 

For candidates who support Asian-Americans, see candidates listed in key contests and Asian-American candidates.

Eliminate affirmative action in university admissions.   When affirmative action at universities was banned in California, Texas, Massachusetts, and Florida, the number of Asian Pacific American students admitted to universities in those states increased by 20-40%.  See Statistics on Reverse Discrimination against Asian-Americans.  
    The webmaster favors affirmative action based on economic status: a poor kid who has the same qualifications as a richer kid should receive a preference in university admissions.  There is no reason wealthy minorities, e.g. Michael Jordan's children, should benefit from affirmative action based on race.

Stop reverse discrimination against Asian-Americans.  Many affirmative action programs, particularly those of government agencies, use groups' percentage of the population as the goal.  They thus try to hire and promote until 51% of the workforce or the contractors are women, 13% are African- American, etc. even though Asian-Americans comprise 15% of the graduates of the most selective colleges.  See Colleges.  This practice results in reverse discrimination against Asian-Americans.  
    District attorneys offices are engaging in reverse discrimination against Asian-Americans.  10.2% of law school graduates are Asian-American (see Law Schools)
According to the Bigots for the Left in Hollywood, Asian American men do not exist.  See Hall of Shame: TV Medical Shows.  Annoy a Bigot for the Left today, contribute to Media Action Network for Asian Americans.

Contribute to non-profits which do not discriminate against Asian Americans

See Colleges for statistics on number of Asian American students.  Is your alma mater below average in the number of Asian American students?  If so, stop donating.  Stop paying Bigots for the Left to discriminate against Asian Americans.  Does your alma mater have any Asian Americans in management positions?  If not, stop donating.  Stop paying Bigots for the Left to discriminate against Asian Americans.  The presidents of Dartmouth, Butler and the University of Maryland are Asian American.  Donate to schools which do not discriminate against Asian Americans. 

Support family values. 
Contribute to:

National Right To Life Committee
419 Seventh St., NW, Suite 500
Washington, D.C.  20077-1470
(202) 626-8800
www.nrlc.org

6/7/11: "Asian men ‘most excluded’ on the Internet dating scene,"
By Sunil Adam
http://asiancorrespondent.com/56797/no-eharmony-with-asian-men/ 
    No one would want to be in the shoes of a black man in America. That is a given. 
    With highest incarceration and unemployment rates, not to mention a reputation for violent behavior and drug use, black males are the most stereotyped segment of American demography. As sociologicallyinsightful comedian Chris Rock claims, even a crippled homeless white man will not want to trade places with him. “And I’m rich,” Rock protests.
    But there is a silver lining. Apparently Asian men are actually worse off than their black counterparts, at least in one category – dating preferences of white American women. According to a survey of racial exclusion patterns in Internet dating, the most excluded categories are Asian men and black women. A survey of 6,000 Internet dating profiles by Belinda Robnett and Cynthia Feliciano of the University of California, Irvine, reportedly found that “Asian males and black females are more highly excluded than 
their opposite sex counterparts.”
    In other words, white American women would rather opt for black men than Asian males (including East Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi), although generally they tend to be more educated, more qualified, more gainfully employed and better placed in the social hierarchy than the average black male. Such social and romantic ostracism even by “fat white women with daddy issues” – the kind who go for black men according to standup comedian Jim Norton – might seem incredulous to Asian men with an 
inflated ego to nurse.
    How does one explain this distressing predicament of Asian men, who are raised to be proud and upright men of character with undisputed leadership roles assigned in the family and society? Even if I’m eminently unqualified to make sociological or cultural deductions, let me offer some possible clues.
    At the outset, Asian men are far fewer in numbers than black or Latino men, which restricts their exposure, availability and access to white women. They are also culturally alien to white women in a way that black or Latino men are not. 
    Barring a small community of Chinese and Japanese immigrants in the Pacific North East, Asian migration is relatively new - most of it taking place after the repeal of racist exclusionary laws in the 1960s. On the other hand, blacks and Latinos were part of the turbulent American history from the very outset, and hence have a history of social relationships with European Americans.
    The enviable standing of black men in sports and music – two major preoccupations of American life also gives them an advantage over Asian men, who are conspicuously absent in American popular culture. And Chinese and Indian students, be it in school or college, are invariably classified as nerds – hardly a “cool” category that generates dating buzz among females, particularly in the “vampire-chick-lit” phase they inexplicably go through.
    It is also interesting that the very reasons why Asian women are sought after by white men who care to date or marry outside their racial confines, are conversely the reasons why Asian men are probably excluded from white female preferences. Several studies, including the aforementioned survey, found white men prefer Asian women because they are seen as “homely” – obedient and faithful – as compared to Asian men, who are possibly unappealing because of their reputation for being domineering, hierarchical and illiberal. Unlike Asian women, Asian men tend to be much more authoritarian, conservative, religious and profess fealty toward their cultural values that are often 
incompatible with Western mores.
    It is also quite possible that white women summarily exclude from their romantic pursuits Muslim men, who form a sizable segment of the Asian-American population that includes Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Central Asians, Arabs, Persians and an assortment of South East Asians. While apathy and animosity toward Muslim men can be explained away, however imprecisely, given the political environment in the
U.S. since the 9/11 terror attacks, religion seems to play curious, even if inconsistent and often contradictory, role in social relationships. For instance, there are many instances of Jewish men marrying Hindu and Buddhist women, but quite inexplicably the same cannot be said about Jewish women opting for Hindu or Buddhist men. Similarly, there is no evidence of white men who are unencumbered by racial considerations preferring Muslim women, although they possess the qualities that are much sought after by such men – obedience and fidelity.
    Although they invariably factor in romantic preferences, none of the surveys I’ve cursorily checked paid adequate attention to white women’s preference or lack thereof to physical characteristics and attributes of Asian men. It would have been interesting to note how they viewed the Mongoloid and Caucasian features and physique of East Asian and East Indians respectively.
    Given my own ethnicity, however, I can say with some certainty that the three-day stubble that young Indian men seem to sport nowadays, aping white young men, will not change their status with white women.
    Lose it. It might help your case in the next survey.